Idea: Ownership & lifetime escape analysis by variables in reference to

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad]

On Sunday, 29 May 2022 at 08:14:18 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
> I'm not concerned too much about preciseness as long as the 
> false positives are low (or at least lower than DIP1000).

It cannot both be simple and low on false positives. Anyway, I 
dont really like the concept of DIP1000.

It basically means that any required change to a function can 
lead to a situation where one has to slap @trusted on it.