Looking for a new maintainer for std.uni/std.regex
rikki cattermole
rikki at cattermole.co.nz
Thu Nov 3 05:39:17 UTC 2022
On 03/11/2022 7:46 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
>> Are you looking for fixes or an entire rework on it?
>
> What would be the point in the entire rework? It took about 4 months to
> write it from scratch, plus the bug fixes found after that. If anything
> I had a plan to support JITing regexes which should work faster than
> CTFE static regex codegen plus avoiding the compile-time penalty. Even
> that doesn’t require an entire rework, in fact it would nicely fit into
> what is there.
One of the libraries I listed from day one that ImportC had to support
is sljit.
They have their own regex implementation which of course is JIT'd.
It would be a good candidate to be included in Phobos.
https://github.com/zherczeg/sljit
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list