What is the better signature for this?

[Kagamin]

On Monday, 10 October 2022 at 12:44:18 UTC, Guillaume Piolat 
wrote:
> That is solution C.
> It could work.

Static array works like this:
```
int Load4LE(in ref ubyte[4] b) pure
{
	return (b[3]<<24)|(b[2]<<16)|(b[1]<<8)|b[0];
}

ubyte[] data;
int val=Load4LE(data[0..4]);
```
It's safe, bound checked, ctfeable, no casts.

> The slight problem is that function that takes __m128i* use 
> that as "any packed integer taking 128-bit" space, and it's not 
> immediately obvious that __m128i is int4 and __m256i is long4, 
> it's rather counterintuitive. Smenatically, it could be short8 
> or byte16...

There's no solution, only tradeoffs.