C++ pattern matching is coming

German Diago germandiago at gmail.com
Wed Oct 26 10:53:50 UTC 2022


On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 06:28:37 UTC, Arun wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 01:06:27 UTC, Ali Çehreli 
> wrote:
>> On 10/25/22 17:53, zjh wrote:
>
>> I am saying the above with full understanding that there are 
>> programmers out there who were educated in C++ circles and are 
>> sure that garbage collectors are for inferior languages. That 
>> is a shortcoming of their education.
>
> For short running tools and low volume stuff, yes, GC is good.
>
> My practical experience running vibe.d service with GC in 
> production: default GC is a bane. Default should've been @nogc.

I would like to hear your experience with Vibe.d. I would care 
about performance scaling. I have been genuinely interested in 
using it for years but I did not dare to jump into it. As opposed 
to Django.

But my intuition tells me that sooner or later Django backends 
for small things like what I do will be a resource hog compared 
to D? True that I can partition, do microservices, etc. but that 
complicates things. On the positive Python side, there is no 
compilation step and that helps a lot in many situations.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list