Implicit conversion to mutable if no indirections?

[Ali Çehreli]

On 9/2/22 12:05, rikki cattermole wrote:

 > struct Foo {
 >      char[] data;
 > }

 > Do you want this to error at compile time or at runtime due to writing
 > to read only memory?

Fair enough but that type has an indirection. I "feel" it should work 
for fundamental types, etc. without indirections but as I said, I 
understand it will ruin template type deduction as well as function 
overloading which I forgot to mention.

This thread is here to remind us to test our templates for const, etc. :)

Ali