Regarding the proposed Binray Literals Deprecation

[Walter Bright]

On 9/10/2022 7:21 AM, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
> Have you ever stopped to ask WHY there's so little confidence in D's leadership?
> 
> This whole thing started because you make the *patently false* statement in 
> DConf that binary literals were *already* deprecated.

Yes, I made a mistake. There was a decision to remove it, but it just got 
deferred and then overlooked.

Not making an excuse, but D has grown to the point where I can't keep it all in 
my head at once. Hence at least one motivation for simplification. I've caught 
Bjarne in errors with C++, too. So what.

 > Yet you presume to lecture us what what things are used and how, then make 
unilateral decisions, just ignoring community experience.

There is a DIP process, and why we have a n.g. where people can discuss. A lot 
of changes I felt were a good idea were dropped because of opposition on the 
n.g., like dropping the initializer syntax in favor of sticking with expression 
style.