D is our last hope
Paulo Pinto
pjmlp at progtools.org
Sun Dec 17 18:50:53 UTC 2023
On Saturday, 16 December 2023 at 21:11:42 UTC, aberba wrote:
> On Thursday, 14 December 2023 at 14:02:26 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
>> On Thursday, 14 December 2023 at 05:40:04 UTC, Hors wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 12 December 2023 at 15:02:11 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> D is not the best when it comes to interop with other
>>> languages
>>
>> It's not terribly helpful to post something like that without
>> elaborating. I've been doing that for ten years and it works
>> great.
>
> Sometimes I wonder how many of the D criticisms come from those
> who have been using the language for yrs in this community or
> have experience enough to make an informed critique.
>
>
> From my limited understanding, D allows nogc code, GC code,
> safe code, interop with many langs, etc. yet it's always not
> enough for some reason.
>
> I wonder how many of those folks are really serious about using
> the language cus it *seems* to me that a lot of experienced D
> devs are quietly getting things done.
>
>
> Is there something I'm missing?
Only that unfortunely D lacks a big pusher like Apple, Google or
Microsoft, where those naysayers would either be dragged into
using D regardless of their opinion on automatic memory
management if they wanted to make money in their platforms, or
would leave to farming or something else.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list