unittest "name" {}

[max haughton]

On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 21:08:38 UTC, Dennis wrote:
> Names on unittests can be useful for documentation, a better 
> message on failure, or to selectively run a specific test. D 
> has no built-in way to name unittests, but the most popular 
> library test runner 
> ([silly](https://code.dlang.org/packages/silly)) uses the first 
> string UDA as a name:
>
> [...]

I don't think it's worth breaking tooling / grammars over.

That being said I am in favour of the language dictating that a 
string in a UDA on a unittest has special meaning (i.e. is a name 
or description)