unittest "name" {}

[Atila Neves]

On Saturday, 11 February 2023 at 00:03:50 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
> On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 22:24:54 UTC, Dennis wrote:
>> On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 21:48:00 UTC, Steven 
>> Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> I personally am fine with the requirements to use a UDA.
>>>
>>> And I also prefer the simple "first string" method,
>>
>> My proposal is purely syntactic sugar, it's exactly the same 
>> as adding a first string UDA.
>
> I like this idea, and I think as @("") has already become the 
> de-facto standard across testing frameworks on DUB we can just 
> make it behave like that and everyone will be happy without 
> breaking changes + it's all quite an easy change for everyone.

The reason I used a string UDA initially (and, probably why silly 
does the same thing) is to avoid having to import a symbol to use 
it there. It's the simplest thing that will work and not 
"corrupt" production code.

Don't get me started on version(unittest).