D has become unbearable and it needs to stop
Basile B.
b2.temp at gmx.com
Tue Jun 13 15:47:35 UTC 2023
On Tuesday, 13 June 2023 at 15:34:28 UTC, Martyn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 June 2023 at 14:17:33 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Thursday, 8 June 2023 at 13:38:20 UTC, GrimMaple wrote:
>>> I usually try to stay more silent (on the form at least), but
>>> I think I reached my boiling point. I've been a (self
>>> employed) full time D developer for almost 2 years now,
>>> developing quite a large codebase of personal closed source
>>> projects, as well as adopting some 3rdparty code like
>>> dlangui. And my life has become particularly miserable in the
>>> last half a year or so.
>>>
>>> [...]
> Anyway, this is a general question for all, and I understand I
> am (likely) showing my n00bness as a D developer.
>
> (Afterall, one of the reasons I am skeptical using Dlang for
> production is precisely this reason... no LTS and, more
> specifically, mangling of libraries tested under different dmd
> builds)
> [...]
> Just my 2 cents and I apologise if I am really missing the
> point. I am sure atleast some of this lands with a number of
> people.
Mangling is not really the problem I think. If the ABI changes
you can still rebuild everything, including the cached
dependencies that would break; Not great but not a big problem. I
think the discussion is more about how the language features are
different from a version to another.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list