Just another example of missing string interpolation

[bachmeier]

On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 15:34:59 UTC, kdevel wrote:

> Your functions `foo` and `bar` both not only make calls to 
> `interp` but they
> also necessarily contain, in order to succeed, the name of the 
> variable.

Yes

> Your approach creates more dependencies between unrelated 
> components than necessary.

Then don't use it? The goal of programming is to get the right 
output.

> How do you unittest `foo` and `bar`?

The same as any other function.

> The dependencies can easily be avoided if `foo` and `bar` only 
> returned the value of the computation, the results are stored 
> in the AA given as `subs` in the call to `interp`.

I prefer less complicated code to code that imposes arbitrary 
restrictions.