Future of D
monkyyy
crazymonkyyy at gmail.com
Sun Oct 29 17:05:10 UTC 2023
On Sunday, 29 October 2023 at 16:46:02 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
> On Sunday, 29 October 2023 at 16:39:28 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
>> On Sunday, 29 October 2023 at 12:54:33 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
>>> The plan is between 50 thousand (realistic) to 100 thousand
>>> (optimistic) devices each year.
>>>
>>> However, we are becoming unsure if D is really an option for
>>> us
>>
>>
>> I'd probably consider hiring compiler devs who are doing
>> something interesting but grumpy with the management and
>> making a d subset compiler that you control if you actually of
>> a size large enough to justify it
>
> Maybe, but it would be best if we didn't have to and could stay
> mainline D as long as possible. I want to hear other peoples
> experiences with this for comparison.
In my experience, only 1 bug report of mine has ever been
addressed; and the drama this week was patches written 6 years
ago.
> Can we count on that if we find an issue with D that it will be
> taken care of?
so the answer is just no; you should not expect d to change
meaningfully ever. If you want a foundation to base a lot of
people's livelihood on you should day 1 plan to build that
foundation in parallel with whatever product you making so you
have the talent on hand and meaningful control over the outcomes.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list