Future of D

[Abdulhaq]

On Sunday, 29 October 2023 at 18:20:40 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
> On Sunday, 29 October 2023 at 18:12:46 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
>> 
>> C++ is the low risk option, for a typical business
>
> That seems dubious, theres also talk of c++ dying, c++ has 
> super long compile times and maybe you use a feature that steps 
> onto a landmine of those hours compiling. And as hard as making 
> a compiler with your subset of d is, making a compiler for c++ 
> seems all that much worse.

Yes reasonable people can certainly differ on this, but the vast 
majority of businesses that are using C++ do not need to maintain 
a C++ compiler/ecosystem. We are considering a business that 
thinks it would need to maintain a D compiler/ecosystem if it 
were to choose D for their business.