Phobos 3 Discussion Notes - 02-01-2024
ryuukk_
ryuukk.dev at gmail.com
Sat Feb 3 11:53:05 UTC 2024
On Saturday, 3 February 2024 at 03:49:54 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
>> - Phobos with betterC
>
> This is not in the cards. BetterC would seriously constrain the
> capability of Phobos as we expect to support
> TypeInfo/ModuleInfo, threading, Dynamic/Associative arrays, and
> static module constructors/destructors.
>
>> Andrea
What typeinfo/moduleinfo has to do with a networking module in
the STD for example?
Dynamic array/associative array can be made to work with
-betterC, i mentioned in my reply above, minimal allocator API in
`core.memory` make associative array able to change its
allocator, and build APIs in phobos around allocators and people
who use betterC will be able to consume phobos without people
working on phobos having to know/care about betterC
If you care about simplicity and efficiency, obviously
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list