What ever happened to move semantics?

[Walter Bright]

On 2/27/2024 4:45 AM, Manu wrote:
> I'd like to see the DIP address this idiom (which Scott Meyers termed a 
> 'universal reference'), which is ESSENTIAL in extern(C++) and must be covered or 
> practically no C++ code can ever be represented:
>    template<T> void fun(T&& universalRef);
> In this case; the template will be instantiated as `Ty&&` or `const Ty&` 
> depending on the rvalue-ness of the argument supplied at the call site.
> 
> I think `auto ref` needs to be covered by the DIP, and probably considered with 
> respect to this point.

Yeah, you're right.