What ever happened to move semantics?

[Timon Gehr]

On 2/27/24 13:16, Manu wrote:
> I'm still as convinced as ever that the single most important thing you 
> or anybody could be doing for the language, is fixing the move hole.

FWIW I have been pushing this a couple times at the DLF meetings, but in 
the end somebody will have to put in the work to implement it in the 
compiler and I cannot spend the time required for that atm.

The move hole is also an issue for tuple unpacking though.