We are forking D
Guillaume Piolat
first.name at gmail.com
Wed Jan 10 11:24:29 UTC 2024
On Wednesday, 10 January 2024 at 10:40:51 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
> Let's come back to pragmatism:
> - everyone thinks DIP1038e is far better than DIP1027
This isn't strictly true.
Some people like me don't care at all don't have time to read DIP
and arguments, and trust the core team to choose for them. It's
called having someone responsible for the design.
I'm in the camp of people fed up hearing about string
interpolation for the last 3 months, and all the drama
surrounding it. I'd rather not have string interpolation than
just hearing about people complaining for months. Because this is
what happened and at this point I can very well live without
variables in quotes.
That's from seeing the leadership fence off bad ideas since years
and years.
A lot of the times, about the right decision was taken.
It's painful seeing people becoming ever more demanding of
open-source projects.
And I remember very well this community to be against
introduction of @nogc, of UDAs (there was massive backlash), of
-betterC, of memory-safety... including me.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list