named arguments, string interpolation, please stop.
Guillaume Piolat
first.name at gmail.com
Thu Jan 11 22:49:51 UTC 2024
On Thursday, 11 January 2024 at 21:37:01 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> This subthread suggests to me that the problem with @nogc is it
> works.
@nogc could get an escape hatch maybe?
pure is especially annoying because no escape hatch.
Perhaps we can live with their UB in a per-attribute basis.
UB of @nogc is allocating with GC, it only annoys in cases
without GC, else well, type system was broken.
It's pretty nice to enforce statically no accidental allocation
in a time critical callback, in short the reasons that made @nogc
invented still apply.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list