Yet another terrible compile time argument proposal

[Timon Gehr]

On 1/14/24 23:15, Timon Gehr wrote:
> ```d
> void foo(int x)(int:x, int y){ }
> 
> void main(){
>      foo(1,2); // calls foo!1(2)
>      foo(2,3); // calls foo!2(3)
> }
> ```

As Steven points out, this should of course have been:

```d
void foo(int x)(int:x, int y){ }

void main(){
     foo(1,2); // calls foo!1(1,2)
     foo(2,3); // calls foo!2(2,3)
}
```

> 
> Maybe it is best to restrict `:` syntax to `enum` parameters but then at least the template parameter list is not being modified by the feature. 

But this still holds and then that example would not even compile.