An idea; Coroutines

[Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole]

On 17/01/2024 10:15 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
>     It may be possible that the language coroutine support may be able
>     to drive it. Which could be worth considering.
> 
> Its the other way around really.

That wasn't what I meant.

I meant that the language feature could be put into its state.

So library coroutine representation and sender/receiver library 
representation would both take as argument the language coroutine feature.

This could be a good example of why I am proposing that the language 
feature should not be library specific. Because we could have multiple 
library representations in our standard library!