I approved DIP1036e

[claptrap]

On Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 12:28:31 UTC, M.M. wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 11:40:31 UTC, claptrap wrote:
>>
>>> In all the discussions, Walter always argues technical 
>>> points, he never abuses or name calls people or attacks them 
>>> personally.
>>
>> Look, the reason there are two people to review the DIPs is so 
>> that Walter doesn't get to review his own DIPs. That process 
>> was set up to avoid conflict of interest.
>
> I understand your desire to have Walter more explicitly 
> detached from decisions about his own DIPs. But, you are aware 
> that DIP1027 was rejected, right?

It's more that he should not have used the talk about 1036 to 
bring back his own DIP that had already been rejected. Not when 
he's the final judge. Is disrespectful and unfair.