I approved DIP1036e

[Meta]

On Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 15:30:27 UTC, zjh wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 15:17:47 UTC, zjh wrote:
>
>> I think it's more convenient to integrate it into the 
>> `'experimental switch'`, after all, there maybe too many 
>> experiments `dip` switch.
>
>
> `Countless dips`, as long as contributors think there is a 
> `good idea`, they can try it out, and then, if everyone thinks 
> it's good, they can join.
> If there are still issues, they can be continuously corrected 
> during use, while also improving the details of the dip.
> If there is a major problem and the 'dip' is not recommended, 
> cancel it!
> Very similar to the plugin style development of vim!
> These switches are implemented by contributors, which can fully 
> mobilize their enthusiasm!
>
> `Dip1027/Dip1036` can all be added, experiment for `1 year or 
> half a year`, and then see which is better! Instead of endless 
> debates.

This is a good point. Rust has unstable features that are only 
available on their nightly builds. Some of them are also gated 
behind a feature flag. The end result is that the community has 
plenty of time to test out new features and hash out any dark 
corners.