You mean slow in terms of productivity? With that I tend to agree. Most scintilla-based editors that I've tried don't offer much more than what is already in Scintilla. It's tends to be a sci-component wrapped in some GUI, with options hidden in some menu somewhere that you have to hunt down (I really prefer text files for settings, like in Scite). But it does load huge files very fast, and seems to handle Unicode well (I've only tried on a couple of files where it displayed unicode correctly, and VIM displayed garbage).<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:44 AM, bearophile <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bearophileHUGS@lycos.com">bearophileHUGS@lycos.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Nick Sabalausky:<br>
> But those are generally fairly minor things, and a number of them I think<br>
> are really more scintilla than PN2 (PN2 uses the scintilla text-edit<br>
> control).<br>
<br>
I avoid all editors based on Scintilla because it is too much slow for me :-)<br>
<br>
Bye,<br>
<font color="#888888">bearophile<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>