Seems to be mainly for Java development.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:43 PM, retard <span dir="ltr"><re@tard.com.invalid></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:24:12 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 16:06:18 sybrandy wrote:<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">>> On 10/12/2010 09:57 PM, Michael Stover wrote:<br>
>> > Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is<br>
>> > still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't<br>
>> > have a release yet. What do actual D programmers use?<br>
>> ><br>
>> > -Mike<br>
>><br>
>> I stick with Vim. Who needs anything else? :P<br>
>><br>
>> Casey<br>
><br>
</div></div><div class="im">> Proper code completion, correctly jumping to function definitions, and<br>
> various other features that IDEs generally do well tend to be quite poor<br>
> in vim. It can do many of them on some level, but for instance, while<br>
> ctags does give you the ability to jump to function declarations, it<br>
> does quite poorly in the face of identical variable names across files.<br>
> There are a number of IDE features that I would love to have and use but<br>
> vim can't properly pull off. When I have a decent IDE, I'm always torn<br>
> on whether to use vim or the IDE. vim (well, gvim) generally wins out,<br>
> but sometimes the extra abilities of the IDE are just too useful. What<br>
> I'd really like is full-featured IDE with complete and completely<br>
> remappable vim bindings.<br>
<br>
</div>I found this with a bit of googling: <a href="http://eclim.org/" target="_blank">http://eclim.org/</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>