Now I'm working that.<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Kenji Hara<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/11/16 Don Clugston <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dac@nospam.com" target="_blank">dac@nospam.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 16/11/12 05:15, Rob T wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Friday, 16 November 2012 at 03:41:45 UTC, Stugol wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Event_t e2;        // Will compile!<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yeah but that kinda blows, doesn't it?<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I found it surprising or unintuitive that the !() is required, and I do<br>
want to know what is the reasoning behind it,<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
One of the oldest open enhancement requests is on this topic:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1012" target="_blank">http://d.puremagic.com/issues/<u></u>show_bug.cgi?id=1012</a><br>
<br>
I don't what the reason is. It'd be interesting to revive the patch there, and see if it passes the compiler test suite.<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>