<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 30 May 2017 at 17:33, Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:digitalmars-d@puremagic.com" target="_blank">digitalmars-d@puremagic.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 05:39:52 UTC, Manu wrote:<br>
</span><span class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
How far are we from integration into LDC without using forked compilers?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
The future is now!<br>
<br>
<a href="https://forum.dlang.org/thread/zcfqujlgnultnqfksbjh@forum.dlang.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://forum.dlang.org/thread<wbr>/zcfqujlgnultnqfksbjh@forum.<wbr>dlang.org</a><br>
<br>
<a href="https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/commit/69ad69e872f53c14c101e2c029c4757c4073f487" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/ldc-develop<wbr>ers/ldc/commit/69ad69e872f53c1<wbr>4c101e2c029c4757c4073f487</a><br>
is the final commit from the stuff I've done prior to dconf.<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Awesome stuff! That was fast :)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">You're right, I'm using kernel<<<...>>>, and it's very convenient.</div><div class="gmail_extra">I looked briefly and realised that I had a lot of work to get running (as you describe), so I stuck with my current setup for the moment :(</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Is a <<<...>>> equivalent going to be possible in D, with kernel object fragments built into the binary together with the CPU code?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I'm definitely looking forward to action in this space, and the wiki to come online :)</div></div>