<div dir="ltr"><div>On 26 September 2017 at 21:41, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:digitalmars-d@puremagic.com" target="_blank">digitalmars-d@puremagic.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Friday, 22 September 2017 at 17:11:56 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:<br>
</span><span class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Should we add `a * b` to ndslice for 1d vectors?<br>
Discussion at <a href="https://github.com/libmir/mir-algorithm/issues/91" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/libmir/mir-<wbr>algorithm/issues/91</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
I'd say yes.<br>
<br>
Atila<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><img src="https://ih0.redbubble.net/image.420026232.1080/st%2Csmall%2C215x235-pad%2C210x230%2Cf8f8f8.lite-1u19.jpg" width="210" height="230"></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Just remember, it's okay to vote no! Even if it makes you a bigoted dick ;)<br>In this case, I think 'no' is the only reasonable choice.</div><div class="gmail_extra">If this is going to seriously be considered, then ndslice should definitely be renamed to 'matrix'.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">An alternative solution might be to introduce a wrapper of ndslice called 'matrix' that supports matrix mul...?</div></div>