[Dlang-internal] DIP1000 discussion and testing

[Martin Nowak via Dlang-internal]

On Monday, 12 December 2016 at 07:17:11 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
> Not quite: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16037

Thanks for all the test cases, it's really the most useful 
approach to close all escape holes. How about tracking all scope 
bugs in Bugzilla using "[scope]" in the title and safe as keyword?

If there are still design-concerns/unclarities about 
(non-)transitivity, we could benefit from a good test case 
illustrating the problem.