[Dlang-internal] Removing stale branches

Mathias Lang via Dlang-internal dlang-internal at puremagic.com
Tue Jun 6 07:35:40 PDT 2017


On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 19:35:58 UTC, Sebastian Wilzbach wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is anyone opposed to cleaning up the branch mess at DMD, 
> Druntime and Phobos?
> GitHub defines a branch stale if it hasn't been updated within 
> the last three months.
> The 2.06X branches are tagged anyways, so I assume they are 
> just an relict from old times?
> Are there any other branches except for newCTFE, dmd-1.x, D1.0, 
> and phobos-1.x that are necessary?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Seb
>
>
> DMD
> ===
>
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/branches/stale
>
> 2.061
> 2.062
> 2.063
> 2.064
> 2.065
> 2.066
> revert-3761-issue13116
> 2.067
> revert-5744-refactor_attrib
> MartinNowak-patch-1
> revert-6217-ddmd-symlink
> rainers-patch-1
>
> Druntime
> ========
>
> https://github.com/dlang/druntime/branches/stale
>
>
> D1.0
> CDGC
> 2.061
> 2.062
> 2.063
> 2.064
> 2.065
> 2.066
> 2.067
> newCTFE
>
> Phobos
> ======
>
> https://github.com/dlang/phobos/branches/stale
>
> 2.061
> 2.062
> 2.063
> 2.064
> 2.065
> 2.066
> 2.067
> phobos-1.x
> changelog_filelogger_default_loglevel
> revert-3995-bigint_bounds
> revert-3859-getopt-checker
> walter_andrei_action_list
> faster_front
> revert-5087-logger-uselessfinal
> newCTFE

I think a good cleanup is in order. The DMD branch of D1 have to 
be kept, but the one in phobos and druntime can be killed AFAIK. 
You can ask Luca / Mihails for confirmation.


More information about the Dlang-internal mailing list