[dmd-beta] dmd 1.062 and 2.047 beta

[Don Clugston]

std.stdio is failing unit tests on Windows. Behaves the same way with
2.048, so it's a Phobos issue, not a compiler bug. Maybe another
appender issue?
--------------------
unittest
core.exception.AssertError at std.stdio(549): unittest failure
object.Exception at std\file.d(1429): Trailing characters at the end of line: `

                                   '
--------------------

On 27 August 2010 15:39, Steve Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I realized that I broke this right away and fixed it, but I forgot to check in.
> Try again now:
>
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1934
>
> -Steve
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario at gmx.de>
>>
>> Hi Andrei,
>>
>> I think Walter has just committed a fix for this. See
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4302
>>
>> I could not verify  it yet, because the current dmd/phobos combination
>> causes an error for  me
>>
>> std\xml.d(373): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression
>> (result.data()) of type string to char[]
>> std\xml.d(1148): Error: template  instance std.xml.encode!(char[]) error
>> instantiating
>>
>> This seems to  have to crept in with the recent Appender changes.
>>
>> Rainer
>>
>> Andrei  Alexandrescu wrote:
>> > Hello Rainer,
>> >
>> > Catching up with my  email backlog. Was there a fix on this issue?
>> >
>> >  Andrei
>> >
>> > On 6/11/10 11:30 PDT, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
>> >>  Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I've tried to untangle the startsWith code, and  here's the minimal test
>> >> case I could come up with so  far:
>> >>
>> >> ///////////////////////
>> >> template  binaryFunImpl(bool b)
>> >> {
>> >> template Body()
>> >>  {
>> >> static assert(b);
>> >> alias bool BodyType;
>> >>  }
>> >> alias Body!().BodyType ReturnType; // line 9
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >> uint startsWith(A)(A a) if (is(binaryFunImpl!(true  ).ReturnType)) {
>> >> return 1; }
>> >> uint startsWith(A)(A a) if  (is(binaryFunImpl!(false).ReturnType)) {
>> >> return 0; } // line  13
>> >>
>> >> const uint var = startsWith(1);
>> >>  ///////////////////////
>> >> dmd produces:
>> >>
>> >>  test.d(6): Error: static assert (b) is false
>> >> test.d(9): instantiated  from here: Body!()
>> >> test.d(13): instantiated from here:  binaryFunImpl!(false)
>> >>
>> >> The error does not show up if var  is not const. Also, dmd 2.032 to 2.045
>> >> do not produce this error  (2.046 fails), so it must be some compiler
>> >>  regression.
>> >>
>> >> As it seems, the compile time evaluation of  startsWith uses the wrong
>> >> specialization. Maybe, it is just not  gagging error output?
>> >>
>> >> Any other ideas? I have not yet  dived too deep into the template code of
>> >> the compiler, but if nobody  has a better clue (and time), I can give it
>> >> a  try.
>> >>
>> >> Rainer
>> >>
>> >> Andrei Alexandrescu  wrote:
>> >>> Thanks. It may take a while before I can tend to this.  Could someone
>> >>> else look at it?
>> >>>
>> >>>  Andrei
>> >>>
>> >>> On 06/10/2010 12:53 PM, Rainer Schuetze  wrote:
>> >>>> Sorry, but it still doesn't work. The error occurs  when the expression
>> >>>> is evaluated at compile time, so the  code added to the unittest
>> >>>> does not
>> >>>>  cover the issue.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>  Rainer
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Andrei Alexandrescu  wrote:
>> >>>>> Apologies. svn up should fix it, and bring some  more goodies too :o).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>  Andrei
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 06/10/2010 10:14 AM,  Don Clugston wrote:
>> >>>>>> const bool fails =  startsWith("ab", "a");
>> >>>>>  _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> dmd-beta  mailing list
>> >>>>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> >>>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ; _______________________________________________
>> >>>> dmd-beta  mailing list
>> >>>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> >>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>  _______________________________________________
>> >> dmd-beta mailing  list
>> >> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>> >  _______________________________________________
>> > dmd-beta mailing  list
>> > dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta  mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>