[dmd-beta] dmd 2.049 beta

[Walter Bright]

I agree that we can't keep yanking stuff with no warning and yet call 
Phobos2 production ready.

David Simcha wrote:
> Speaking of sortedRange, I think we need to put lowerBound, upperBound 
> and canFindSorted back in std.algorithm, but make them scheduled for 
> deprecation.  I was actually using these and a bunch of my code broke. 
>
> In general, I don't think we need to be anal about backwards 
> compatibility in Phobos yet, but I think that when things are removed 
> they should always be scheduled for deprecation for a few releases, 
> then deprecated for a few releases, never removed without any warning 
> whatsoever.
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario at gmx.de 
> <mailto:r.sagitario at gmx.de>> wrote:
>
>
>     I've hit a bad assertion in the new std.range.SortedRange:
>
>               immutable size_t msb = bsr(this._input.length) + 1;
>               assert(msb > 0 && msb < this._input.length);
>
>     fails for length 2.
>
>