[dmd-beta] 64 bit beta for Linux

Jonathan M Davis jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Thu Feb 10 14:40:12 PST 2011

On Thursday, February 10, 2011 13:55:26 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 2/10/11 3:20 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 February 2011 12:48:07 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >> Doesn't version(StdDdoc) take care of this as discussed?
> > 
> > I don't know. I've never heard of version(StdDdoc) that I recall. I
> > thought that the issue was that we had to pick a version to use instead
> > of version(D_Ddoc) (which could be StdDdoc) and then adjust the
> > makefiles appropriately. So, unless the makefiles have already been
> > adjusted, I don't see how version(StdDdoc) could work. Or maybe I'm
> > missing or misunderstanding something here.
> That is it. The makefile has not been adjusted but that's minor work.
> We'd essentially be getting back to our previous approach to generating
> documentation.

Well, then I suggest that we adjust the makefiles relatively soon (before the 
next release certainly) for both druntime and phobos. And you're probably the 
man for the job in this case. You're the one dealing with the documentation on 
the website, and presumably you have a fair idea of what to do.

I'm perfectly willing to go and fix std.datetime and elsewhere to use 
version(StdDoc), but I don't want to be the one to edit the makefiles (though a 
search and replace on version(D_Ddoc) would be easy enough, so fixing the source 
files isn't hard).

- Jonathan M Davis

More information about the dmd-beta mailing list