[dmd-beta] beta 2

[Walter Bright]

On 7/6/2011 12:08 PM, David Simcha wrote:
> Again, where does this leave the weakly pure function issue?  I want to be 
> sure that weak purity for non-const member functions is going away forever 
> before I take it out of all my code and test this beta in any detail.
>

The trouble was that there were a lot of functions marked as 'pure' that were 
changing things pointed to by its arguments.

I understand that within a pure function, such a pure function could modify 
locals without the caller becoming impure. But those functions are still impure.