[dmd-beta] Time for beta - 2.066?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Same here.

Andrei

On 1/12/14 9:48 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> I am strongly against skipping 2.065.  Just fix it and release it.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com
> <mailto:walter at digitalmars.com>> wrote:
>
>     The regression list is looking purty good now:
>
>     https://d.puremagic.com/__issues/buglist.cgi?query___format=advanced&bug_severity=__regression&bug_status=NEW&bug___status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=__REOPENED
>     <https://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED>
>
>     The first 3 were there for 2.064, no change there.
>
>     https://d.puremagic.com/__issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
>     <https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11543> I suspect is
>     not even a regression.
>
>     https://d.puremagic.com/__issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11896
>     <https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11896> should be fixed
>
>     The only question I have is given the confusion around 2.065, I'd
>     like to just reboot with 2.066 and go to beta.
>     _________________________________________________
>     dmd-beta mailing list
>     dmd-beta at puremagic.com <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
>     http://lists.puremagic.com/__mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>     <http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>