<div dir="ltr"><div>2013/6/9 Brad Roberts <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:braddr@puremagic.com" target="_blank">braddr@puremagic.com</a>></span><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Well, there's still 4 open regressions.  Assuming they apply to the 2.063 branch, they ought to be addressed.</blockquote><div> </div>I closed one already-fixed issue.<div><a href="http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10299">http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10299</a><br>
</div><div><br></div><div style>Create a pull request for one.</div><div style><a href="http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10268">http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10268</a><br></div><div style><a href="https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1340">https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1340</a><br>
</div><div style><br></div><div style>And, bug10215 is not a true compiler regression. It exists just only in the released package.</div><div style><a href="http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10215#c9">http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10215#c9</a><br>
</div><div style><br></div><div style>Then, I have no opinion about bug10255...</div><div style><a href="http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10255">http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10255</a><br></div>
<div style><br></div><div style>Kenji Hara</div></div>