[dmd-internals] segv regression found by dmd test suite

Brad Roberts braddr at puremagic.com
Tue Dec 7 20:52:52 PST 2010


It's on my todo list to send mail on each failure.  They're rare enough that
showing 'fix me' 'fix me' 'fix me' until it's fixed isn't that bad.  I just
haven't gotten that one to the top of my priority list.  Maybe I should bump it
up a little.

That said, it's not _that_ hard to glance at a web page every once in a while...

On 12/7/2010 8:49 PM, Jason House wrote:
> Is it possible to generate an email after n failures?
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Dec 7, 2010, at 11:30 PM, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
> 
>> It looks like dmd change 777 introduced a change that causes one of the failure
>> test cases to segv.  Yeah, the auto-tester has been failing on linux for a
>> rather long time.  Just got around to looking at it.
>>
>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/777
>>
>> $ gdb --args ../src/dmd -v -Ifail_compilation   -odtest_results/fail_compilation
>> -oftest_results/fail_compilation/fail278_0.o -c fail_compilation/fail278.d
>> (gdb) run
>> binary    /home/braddr/sandbox/d/source/trunk/dmd/src/dmd
>> version   v2.051
>> config    /home/braddr/sandbox/d/source/trunk/dmd/src/dmd.conf
>> parse     fail278
>> importall fail278
>> import    object        (~/sandbox/d/source/trunk/druntime/import/object.di)
>> semantic  fail278
>>
>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> 0x0812baf9 in TemplateInstance::mangle (this=0x82496f8) at mangle.c:225
>> 225         Dsymbol *par = isnested || isTemplateMixin() ? parent :
>> tempdecl->parent;
>>
>> (gdb) print tempdecl
>> $1 = (TemplateDeclaration *) 0x0
>>
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0  0x0812baf9 in TemplateInstance::mangle (this=0x82496f8) at mangle.c:225
>> #1  0x08186925 in TemplateInstance::genIdent (this=0x8249650) at template.c:4684
>> #2  0x08187b58 in TemplateMixin::semantic (this=0x8249650, sc=0x8249838) at
>> template.c:5190
>> #3  0x0818537c in TemplateInstance::semantic (this=0x8249460, sc=0x82493d0,
>> fargs=0x0) at template.c:4016
>> #4  0x08184a94 in TemplateInstance::semantic (this=0x8249460, sc=0x82493d0) at
>> template.c:3687
>> #5  0x080db0f3 in ScopeExp::semantic (this=0x8249500, sc=0x82493d0) at
>> expression.c:3587
>> #6  0x080b2f4c in VarDeclaration::semantic (this=0x8248ef0, sc=0x82493d0) at
>> declaration.c:1243
>> #7  0x0804b1ee in AttribDeclaration::semanticNewSc (this=0x8244538,
>> sc=0x8249170, stc=4, linkage=LINKd, protection=PROTpublic, explicitProtection=0,
>> structalign=8) at attrib.c:126
>> #8  0x0804bd14 in StorageClassDeclaration::semantic (this=0x8244538,
>> sc=0x8249170) at attrib.c:414
>> #9  0x0818537c in TemplateInstance::semantic (this=0x8213ef8, sc=0x82141f0,
>> fargs=0x0) at template.c:4016
>> #10 0x08184a94 in TemplateInstance::semantic (this=0x8213ef8, sc=0x82141f0) at
>> template.c:3687
>> #11 0x0813f569 in TypeInstance::resolve (this=0x8214030, loc=..., sc=0x82141f0,
>> pe=0xffffcfa8, pt=0xffffcfac, ps=0xffffcfa4) at mtype.c:5902
>> #12 0x0813f7d8 in TypeInstance::toDsymbol (this=0x8214030, sc=0x82141f0) at
>> mtype.c:5968
>> #13 0x080b026d in AliasDeclaration::semantic (this=0x82140a8, sc=0x82141f0) at
>> declaration.c:463
>> #14 0x08130b29 in Module::semantic (this=0x8213208) at module.c:787
>> #15 0x0812e0d9 in main (argc=13, argv=0x8209520) at mars.c:1171
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-internals mailing list
>> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals



More information about the dmd-internals mailing list