[dmd-internals] What is the point of runnable/testdate.d?

[kenji hara]

I think that the dmd tests depends on phobos should move to.

Kenji Hara

2011/8/15 Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com>:
> From what I can tell, it's just testing std.date. I would have thought that
> that's the sort of testing that you'd do in std.date, not dmd. And since
> std.date has now been deprecated, it seems that that's breaking dmd's tests.
>
> So, does these tests need to be rewritten for std.datetime, or should we just
> get rid ouf them? I don't understand why the tests exist in the first place.
> It's the sort of thing that I would have expected to see in std.date, not dmd.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
>