[dmd-internals] I think we should deprecate array .sort and .reverse properties in this release

Andrei Alexandrescu andrei at erdani.com
Sun Oct 9 19:30:11 PDT 2011


Good points. I'm for ripping the band-aid right off.

Related - we should come with a plan with milestones and a deadline for 
gcc integration. Iain, are you on this list?


Andrei

On 10/9/11 1:38 PM, Don Clugston wrote:
> The builtin array.sort and array.reverse have often been mentioned as
> "will be deprecated", for several years now.
> Bug 1339 "Invariant/const-ness is broken by built-in array properties
> sort and reverse" has just been fixed.
> It seems silly to have people fix such code, only to have it broken
> again when those properties are deprecated.
>
> We should also think about deprecating typedef as well. Unless there's
> a _really_ good reason for delaying it a bit longer, we should do it
> now.
> The longer we leave it, the worse it gets.
>
> Additionally, once GDC gets officially included in gcc, deprecating
> stuff will be much harder.
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals


More information about the dmd-internals mailing list