[dmd-internals] Status of dmd pull requests

Daniel Murphy yebblies at gmail.com
Sat Sep 3 19:39:34 PDT 2011


I'm manually approving github users before testing their pull requests.

Hopefully this will be enough.

On a side note, does anybody have any idea what's behind the phobos
test failure?

On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
> Good stuff.  Thanks for doing this.  Are you doing anything to protect yourself against malicious pulls?  Anyone
> anywhere can submit a pull request for any code whatsoever.  Not super likely to happen, but it certainly could.
>
> Later,
> Brad
>
> On 9/2/2011 11:29 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>> Now available at http://yebblies.com/results/
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Daniel Murphy <yebblies at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've been working on an automated tester for dmd pull requests, and
>>> here are the results (after running for 12 hours)
>>> I've been running these on ubuntu, and I have no idea why the
>>> std.datetime unittests are always failing, but at least it's
>>> consistent.
>>> Any pulls which rely on other pulls, naturally won't work.
>>> Some of these results may already be out of date.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
>


More information about the dmd-internals mailing list