[dmd-internals] regressions, criticals, and blockers

[Walter Bright]

The severity level is set by the submitter. I think that we can either spend 
time arguing over what severity level it should be, or we can spend the time 
fixing them.

On 4/27/2012 5:10 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> Yeah, that's really how I interpret 'blocker' too.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com 
> <mailto:jmdavisProg at gmx.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Friday, April 27, 2012 15:50:57 Walter Bright wrote:
>     >
>     http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity
>     <http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity>
>     > =regression&bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_status=NEW&bug_st
>     > atus=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
>     >
>     > 69 of 'em, this is what we should be trying to tamp down
>
>     I would note that if "blocker" meant anything like it's name would indicate,
>     we should _never_ do a release with any blockers still in bugzilla. Whether we
>     really want to function that way or not, I don't know, but that would be what
>     the term indicates, and that's _not_ how we've been functioning.
>
>     - Jonathan M Davis
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-internals/attachments/20120427/81842098/attachment.html>