[dmd-internals] type inconsistency in the source code

Leandro Lucarella luca at llucax.com.ar
Fri Jan 27 17:34:22 PST 2012


mrmocool at gmx.de, el 28 de enero a las 00:54 me escribiste:
> >Well, it's a matter of taste really, I like the _t, I don't see how is
> >a bad practice (in C at least makes a lot of sense). Also, even being
> >a D compiler, is written in C/C++ and you already have those types
> >there, I thought part of your improvements were to remove artificial
> >typedef with strange names.
> >
> >Anyway, I don't care that much...
> 
> Yeah, I know maybe practice isn't the right word.
> Anyway, primarily I'd like to have consistent types (+ no senseless
> typedefs, yes).
> 
> Secondarily I'd love to have types that at least look like they were
> builtin. But it's okay if that isn't desired.

Well, you have to convince Walter, he is the only one deciding what's in
and what's out... I was just commenting because you asked for comments
:)

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca)                     http://llucax.com.ar/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Si ella es el sol, yo soy la luna
Si ella es el mar, soy el desierto
Y estamos en eclipse total
Y estamos en eclipse total


More information about the dmd-internals mailing list