[dmd-internals] New DIP handling process

Михаил Страшун via dmd-internals dmd-internals at puremagic.com
Mon Jun 27 05:03:55 PDT 2016

On 06/27/2016 02:42 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 5:00 AM, Михаил Страшун via dmd-internals <dmd-internals at puremagic.com> wrote:
>> I also wanted to import all implemented DIPs from wiki but have some
>> doubts about how better to proceed with it. Problem is that old DIPs are
>> really of terrible quality by the standards we want to set up for new
>> submissions - importing them as they are would give a very bad example
>> to follow.
>> Would anyone mind if those are rewrited the retrospectively to contain
>> more information about state of art?
> I would say any DIPs that are already approved or implemented should be copied for historical reasons. Any other ones should be left alone, and if the author still wishes to pursue, they should open a new DIP using the new process.
> -Steve

I agree. My question was about should they be copied untouched or
adapted to requirements of Template.md

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-internals/attachments/20160627/ce592832/attachment.sig>

More information about the dmd-internals mailing list