[dmd-internals] Implementation change without matching spec change

Walter Bright via dmd-internals dmd-internals at puremagic.com
Mon Jun 27 12:40:51 PDT 2016

On 6/27/2016 5:24 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> As usual Walter, the answer is to not push incremental changes to
> master but instead to develop them in a branch.

Small changes are easier to review. Large ones don't get reviewed at all, or get 
nitpicks like bikeshedding over spelling, or somebody just holds their breath 
and pulls it.

Maybe doing things as branches works in other organizations where people can 
gather in the conference room and go over it together, but I don't think it 
works for us where we work fairly independently in multiple timezones.

More information about the dmd-internals mailing list