[dmd-internals] Implementation change without matching spec change
Walter Bright via dmd-internals
dmd-internals at puremagic.com
Mon Jun 27 12:40:51 PDT 2016
On 6/27/2016 5:24 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> As usual Walter, the answer is to not push incremental changes to
> master but instead to develop them in a branch.
Small changes are easier to review. Large ones don't get reviewed at all, or get
nitpicks like bikeshedding over spelling, or somebody just holds their breath
and pulls it.
Maybe doing things as branches works in other organizations where people can
gather in the conference room and go over it together, but I don't think it
works for us where we work fairly independently in multiple timezones.
More information about the dmd-internals