<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">On Sep 3, 2010, at 3:19 AM, Don Clugston <<a href="mailto:dclugston@googlemail.com">dclugston@googlemail.com</a>> wrote:</span></div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><blockquote type="cite"><span>Similarly, many bugzilla entries gave a "reduced test case" posted to them when Don confirms the bug. Such tests should also make their way into the test suite.</span><br></blockquote><span></span><br><span>That could be helpful, and save a little bit of time. Note, though,</span><br><span>that usually, by the time I've created a good test case, I've nearly</span><br><span>fixed the bug.</span><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#005001"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#0023A3"><br></font></font></div></blockquote><br><div>Honestly, I would be shocked if you claimed it was a big time saver when developing the patch. The savings occur over time when they catch regressions.</div></body></html>