<div dir="ltr">2013/6/2 Walter Bright <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:walter@digitalmars.com" target="_blank">walter@digitalmars.com</a>></span><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div class="im">
<br>
<div>On 6/1/2013 2:49 PM, Kenji Hara wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">2013/6/2 Walter Bright <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:walter@digitalmars.com" target="_blank">walter@digitalmars.com</a>></span><br>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> 1. We already have
a 2.063.1 released. An update would be 2.063.2.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>? Sorry, I might have some misunderstanding. </div>
<div>Currently we can access the "2.063"
release package from here.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="http://dlang.org/download.html" target="_blank">http://dlang.org/download.html</a><br>
</div>
<div><a href="http://downloads.dlang.org.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/releases/2013/dmd.2.063.zip" target="_blank">http://downloads.dlang.org.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/releases/2013/dmd.2.063.zip</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Is this internally called by the name
"2.063.1"? <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>Yes, and it is so tagged in github.<div class="im"><blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>We already have v2.063 tag in git repository,
so I've thought that 2.063 is different from 2.063.1. Is
that incorrect?</div></div></div></div></blockquote></div>
The v2.063 was an aborted 'release'. 2.063.1 is what was released.
(The compiler & libraries are unchanged, what happened was the
documentation was fixed.)</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div>OK. I restored v2.063.1 tags to each repos.</div></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div class="im"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">2. I'd prefer to
wait a bit to collect any more regressions before
rushing out with an update.</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>OK. Waiting next "fix-up" release a while seems
reasonable. In my opinion, one or two weeks would be good.
But a month is a bit long to me.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>I agree.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Thanks.</div><div style><br></div><div style>Kenji Hara</div></div></div></div>