Another Devi: SLMail (was Re: [Greylist-users] GroupWise is the Devil)

[Evan Harris]

I've sent the maker of the software an email detailing the problem.

However, while sending it, I wonder if we should be submitting these mail
systems to rfc-ignorant.org.  Might be useful as the stick if the carrot of
improving their software doesn't compel them to fix it.

Evan


On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, David F. Skoll wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It looks like something called "SLMail" also fails to handle greylisting
> correctly.  SLMail seems to be this product:
>
> http://www.bvrpusa.com/index.asp?page=http://www.seattlelab.com/products/slmail/
>
> >From one of my clients:
>
> ------------ Transcript of session follows ------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mailer-Daemon [mailto:MAILER-DAEMON at hidden.for.privacy]
> Sent: June 25, 2003 5:08 PM
> To: Hidden For Privacy
>
> Reason: Fatal error sending message: No legal recipients
>
> Sending message to hidden at for.privacy.org
>
> -----------------First 8192 bytes of-------------------
> ------- Unsent message enclosed after this line -------
> Received: by mail.hidden.for.privacy from localhost
>     (router,slmail V5.1); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:08:21 -0400
>     for <hidden at for.privacy.org>
> Received: from hidden [192.168.0.72]
>  by mail.hidden.for.privacy [192.168.0.9]  (SLmail 5.1.0.4420) with ESMTP
>  id EF8CBC08EF374CBCB819E458071E21A3
>  for <hidden at for.privacy.org>; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:08:03 -0400
> From: "---" <hidden at hidden.for.privacy>
> To: "'X. Y. Z.'" <hidden at for.privacy.org>
> Subject: kzyyzyz
>
> _______________________________________________
> Greylist-users mailing list
> Greylist-users at lists.puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/greylist-users
>