[Greylist-users] Looking for updated list of bad (but good) senders

Ken Raeburn raeburn at raeburn.org
Tue Sep 14 17:52:27 PDT 2004

Scott Nelson <scott at spamwolf.com> writes:
>>Of course, spammers could just invent new addresses to use when
>>submitting their new entries, so previously unknown submitters perhaps
>>shouldn't be trusted much, maybe just big-ISP reps and people active
>>on this list, or something....
> Well, they /could/ but is this really a big concern?

No, you're probably right.

Though I would still like to see reasons for the various whitelist
entries, i.e., what do they do wrong.


More information about the Greylist-users mailing list