[Greylist-users] Handling servers that don't wait on their retries
ian at midori.shacknet.nu
Wed Feb 25 23:58:03 PST 2009
This method you use would certainly partly handle the problem. I think
however one drawback of your method is that if there are a significant number
of users sending mails from one server to another, your method might start
refusing connections when in fact there is only a larger number of mails
coming at one point in time. For example, if a lot of users from one
university send a lot of mails to users at another university, your method
may kick in and refuse the connections. I realise the situation is not
particularly likely, but still possible. This is where I would see an
advantage of the method I have proposed, in that such a situation would be
better handled, imho.
OK, one could also argue about a spammer sending his 5h17 to multiple
receivers on one server. In that specific case it's difficult to see which
method would do the job better unless we know beforehand the exact method the
spammer is using.
And just to note, I'm now away for five days and not reading my mails, so
don't be angry when I don't answer immediately.
regards from an ex Briso in Vienna ;-)
On Thursday 26 February 2009 06:30, Stephen Carr wrote:
> Dear Ian
> I think I solved this problem by setting the ClientConn and ClientRate in
> access file
> I see instances of hundreds of connections from a site in a few minutes
> but they are rejected eg
> sendmail : ruleset=check_relay, arg1=[220.127.116.11],
> arg2=18.104.22.168, relay=[22.214.171.124], reject=421 4.3.2 Connection
> rate limit exceeded.
> before the are handled by relaydelay.
> Stephen Carr
More information about the Greylist-users