[phobos] New time lib

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Yes, and I'd like to extend an invitation to both the authors of the 
serialization library and the time library to join Phobos. All - do I 
have your agreement?

Speaking of which: in case you're worried of too broad acceptance of 
people into Phobos, I think that's what we need to do right now. We 
finally have an email hook so anyone can take a look at what's checked 
in, and suggest changes if code is not up to snuff. Later on we can 
devise some stricter means to select people and code.

By the way - does anyone know of a good "diff" utility that allows us to 
look at proposed changes and add comments to them etc.? We use one 
in-house at my employer and it's very very useful.


Andrei

On 04/27/2010 01:42 PM, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
> I think Phobos should include this, it looks very well written:
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D.announce&article_id=18075
>
> It's very similar to the improvements I made to Tango a while back, but with well thought-out improvements to the interface to get it D2 shape.
>
> My preference would be to put the Span part into druntime, and the rest into a phobos module.  This allows things like Thread.sleep to use Span.
>
> -Steve
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos