[phobos] Tango and the new time lib

[Sean Kelly]

The boost approach is a bit different and is supported by actual legal  
advice. The license lives in a file and each source file contains a 3  
line copyright note.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 29, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Ellery Newcomer <ellery- 
newcomer at utulsa.edu> wrote:

> Don Clugston <dclugston at ...> writes:
>
>>
>> I tried hard to get Tango to use the Boost license. More recently, I
>> tried to get the Boost license available as a standard option in the
>> Tango ddoc templates. They wouldn't even do that, and someone  
>> modified
>> my "support Boost license" ticket into "support Apache 2.0 license"
>> !!!!
>> I concluded that there is little chance of healing the Tango-Phobos
>> rift, because there are people on the Tango side who do not want
>> unity.
>> Sadly, it only takes one to tango.
>>
>
>
> What's the consensus over here on the tango team's solution to the  
> binary
> attribution clause? They say they're going to include the license as  
> a static
> string somewhere in the source code to pull the bother off the user.
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos